StarTalk Radio
Episode overview

How The Brain Perceives Time, with David Eagleman

StarTalk Radio · 29 August 2026 · 1h 4m · 5 Egleze moments
How The Brain Perceives Time, with David Eagleman ▶

What happened in this episode?

Neil deGrasse Tyson and co-hosts interview Stanford neuroscientist David Eagleman about how the brain constructs perception, with a focus on time, sensory substitution, and memory. Eagleman describes work on ‘sensory substitution’—routing information through different channels—citing early experiments that mapped camera input to tactile stimulation and his own lab’s efforts to convert sound into vibration patterns on skin for deaf users.

A large portion of the episode centres on neuroplastic competition between sensory systems. Eagleman argues that unused brain ‘territory’ can be repurposed, pointing to evidence that occipital (visual) cortex can become engaged in Braille reading in blind people, and discussing echolocation in blind navigation. He then advances a hypothesis that dreaming functions as a defence of the visual cortex during sleep, claiming rapid sensory takeover can begin after about an hour of blindfolding and saying his team observed more dreaming in primate species with greater plasticity.

On time perception, Eagleman recounts an experiment dropping volunteers from a tall tower to test whether fear produces true slow-motion perception; he says the effect is instead a memory-density illusion. He also describes timing recalibration experiments where gradual delays between action and outcome can make people later experience the outcome as occurring before their action.

Eagleman links these timing effects to mental health, arguing schizophrenia may involve disrupted timing that drives misattribution of agency and auditory hallucinations, and says he is exploring a video-game-like recalibration approach. The conversation closes with a discussion of consciousness as an unsolved problem and how AI raises practical questions about detecting machine consciousness.

What are the key points?

Who is speaking?

Named speakers identified in Egleze's source-linked moments from this episode.

Which topics are covered?

How is this page sourced?

Programme
StarTalk Radio
Published
29 August 2026
Duration
1h 4m
Original episode
Open the original source ↗

Egleze verifies the speaker, source and timestamp for each linked moment. Unless a moment is explicitly marked independently verified, statements remain attributed claims by the named speaker rather than established facts.

Watch original episode More from StarTalk Radio

5 moments from this episode

Source-linked · editorially selected
01
Science

David Eagleman argues dreaming keeps the visual cortex active in darkness

David Eagleman · at 16:43 · Attributed speaker claim
And so what we've realized is dreams are the brain's way of keeping that territory active. every 90 minutes you you have this random burst of activity that just goes blasting into the primary visual cortex and that's it.

David Eagleman says rapid neuroplastic “takeover” effects can begin quickly when visual input is removed, citing observations of visual-cortex activity changes after about 60 minutes of blinding. He and his student Don Vaughn propose that dreaming functions to keep visual-cortex territory active during periods of darkness and sleep, with bursts of activity into primary visual cortex about every 90 minutes.

02
Science

David Eagleman says post-9/11 study found ‘flashbulb’ memories drift

David Eagleman · at 30:38 · Attributed speaker claim
And it turns out that both memories, both the banal memories from September 10th and the extremely emotionally intense memories from September 11th, they all drift. They drift around entirely.

David Eagleman says colleagues interviewed New Yorkers who saw the World Trade Center towers collapse, asking detailed questions about 11 September 2001 and about ordinary details from 10 September. He says follow-ups over time, including 10 years later, found that both vivid 9/11 memories and banal day-before memories changed substantially, while repeatedly reinforced public facts stayed more stable.

03
Science

David Eagleman says fear doesn’t create ‘slow-motion’ perception but can make memories feel longer afterwards

David Eagleman · at 44:59 · Attributed speaker claim
And what we were testing is, do you actually see in slow motion when you're in fear for your life? And I'll skip many of the details, but the punchline is that you do not. You don't actually see in slow motion.

Guest neuroscientist David Eagleman says his lab tested whether people truly perceive events in slow motion during extreme fear by dropping volunteer subjects from a 150-foot tower into a safety net and measuring perceptual limits using a wrist device that flashed information. He says the results did not show slowed perception; instead, high-stress moments generate unusually dense memories, which can make the episode seem to have lasted longer in retrospect.

04
Science

Time-delay experiment can make cause-and-effect feel reversed, David Eagleman says

David Eagleman · at 54:05 · Attributed speaker claim
So, after you've gotten used to this 200 millcond delay, I remove it. So, now you hit the button and the light flashes and you say, "Whoa, I didn't do that. It flashed before I hit the button."

David Eagleman describes an experiment where a button press triggers a flash, while researchers gradually increase the delay between action and flash until participants adapt and perceive it as instant. He says that when the delay is then removed, participants can report that the flash happened before the button press, illustrating how the brain recalibrates timing rather than simply reporting event order.

05
Psychology

David Eagleman argues schizophrenia may involve disrupted time perception

David Eagleman · at 55:04 · Attributed speaker claim
So that led me down this road that I've been pursuing for years, which is that schizophrenia is actually fundamentally a disorder of time perception. And that if you're not getting your timing signals lined up exactly right, then schizophrenia is the obvious thing that happens.

Following his description of timing-recalibration illusions, neuroscientist David Eagleman says he has pursued the idea that schizophrenia may be “fundamentally” a disorder of time perception. He suggests misaligned timing signals could contribute to “credit misattribution” and, in one example, could help explain auditory hallucinations if an internally generated voice is perceived as arriving before it was produced and is then attributed to an external source.