Geopolitics

Scott Horton cites Philip Zelikow: Iraq threat ‘dare not speak its name’

Name: Scott Horton cites Philip Zelikow: Iraq threat ‘dare not speak its name’
Uploaded: 2026-07-27T16:26:00+00:00
Description: Libertarian commentator and author Scott Horton tells Julian Dorey that former US official Philip Zelikow privately framed Iraq’s main strategic relevance as a threat to Israel, not to the United States. Horton argues Zelikow’s reported remark illustrates why the Bush administration publicly foregrounded US security claims rather than Israel-related rationales ahead of the 2003 invasion.

Julian Dorey Daily · The Terrifying 9/11 Excuse & the Dark Israel Plot Nobody Touched | Scott Horton · July 27, 2026

Julian Dorey Daily

The Terrifying 9/11 Excuse & the Dark Israel Plot Nobody Touched | Scott Horton

""Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us?" I'll tell you what I think the real threat is, and actually has been since 1990. It's the threat against Israel. [snorts] And this is the threat that dare not speak its name because the Europeans don't care deeply about that threat, I will tell you frankly."

Libertarian commentator and author Scott Horton tells Julian Dorey that former US official Philip Zelikow privately framed Iraq’s main strategic relevance as a threat to Israel, not to the United States. Horton argues Zelikow’s reported remark illustrates why the Bush administration publicly foregrounded US security claims rather than Israel-related rationales ahead of the 2003 invasion.

About this episode

Scott Horton joins Julian Dorey for a wide-ranging discussion of the lead-up to the 2003 Iraq invasion and the political use of 9/11 in selling it to the US public. Horton argues neoconservative networks inside government and sympathetic media helped drive the war, alleging that the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans bypassed standard intelligence review, leaned on claims from Iraqi exile Ahmed Chalabi, and pushed material directly to the vice-president’s office and journalists.

Dorey presses on whether oil was a central motive; Horton disputes that major US oil companies “drove” the war and instead frames Israel’s security concerns and neoconservative strategy documents as pivotal. Horton quotes what he attributes to former US official Philip Zelikow, suggesting Iraq’s core “threat” was to Israel and that this rationale was not made explicit publicly.

The conversation turns to 9/11 intelligence failures. Horton recounts the Zacarias Moussaoui case, claiming FBI headquarters blocked a FISA warrant sought by the Minneapolis office and arguing earlier access might have disrupted the plot. He also states he believes US forces allowed Osama bin Laden to escape at Tora Bora, alleging a political incentive to sustain a broader war narrative.

In the final section, Horton disputes a World War II analogy raised by Dorey, claiming US policy deliberately provoked Japan into attacking at Pearl Harbor, citing the McCollum memo as presented by author Robert Stinnett, and arguing that Britain and the US made strategic choices that had long-term consequences for the Cold War order.

Key takeaways

Horton alleges the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans ‘cooked’ or selectively used intelligence to bolster the Iraq WMD narrative and bypassed CIA vetting.
He disputes that US oil companies were the prime mover behind the Iraq invasion, instead emphasising neoconservative aims and Israel-focused strategy.
Horton cites a reported Philip Zelikow remark framing Iraq’s main strategic relevance as a threat to Israel rather than the US.
He claims FBI headquarters blocked a FISA warrant request connected to Zacarias Moussaoui and argues earlier action could have disrupted the 9/11 plot.
Horton says he believes the US ‘let bin Laden go’ at Tora Bora, alleging political motives tied to sustaining war momentum.
He argues Pearl Harbor was preceded by deliberate US provocation, citing the McCollum memo as described in Robert Stinnett’s work.

More stories More from Julian Dorey Daily