Professor Jiang | This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von #675

Theo Von speaks with YouTuber and teacher ‘Professor Jiang’ (who later says he is a high-school teacher without a PhD) about geopolitics, war risks and what he calls a game-theory approach to forecasting. The conversation centres on the Middle East, maritime choke points such as the Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb, and the potential economic consequences of disrupted oil, food and fertiliser flows.

Jiang outlines an ‘escalation ladder’ model for how a US–Iran conflict could intensify, including a prediction that US strikes could eventually target Iranian power plants as a coercive step. He also speculates about the risk of wider regional wars, while Theo Von presses him on why the US would enter another Middle East conflict after Iraq and Afghanistan.

Jiang argues that a 1996 Israeli-linked policy paper, the ‘Clean Break’ memo, provides a framework for later US interventions, and says both Democrats and Republicans have participated in a long-running strategy—claims he presents as pattern-based reasoning rather than documented decision-making. He makes further controversial assertions about influence operations and intelligence, including an allegation that former Pentagon official Douglas Feith was suspected of being an Israeli asset.

The episode moves into speculative territory on surveillance, with Jiang calling Gaza a ‘testing ground’ and floating a scenario involving Israel and India. It closes with broader reflections on media gatekeeping, pandemic-era trust in experts, and personal themes of faith, family and resilience.

• The guest says he uses game theory to make geopolitical predictions and describes war escalation as a stepwise ‘ladder’.
• He predicts future escalation could include US strikes on Iranian power plants to deny civilians electricity (a speculative claim).
• He argues the 1996 ‘Clean Break’ memo should be read as a blueprint for a ‘Greater Israel Project’, and alleges it aligns with later US wars.
• He alleges Douglas Feith was long ‘suspected’ of being an Israeli asset, without providing evidence in the conversation.
• He calls Gaza a ‘testing ground’ for a surveillance state and speculates about future labour migration tied to surveillance technology.
• He predicts Trump could seek a third term via a vice-presidency ‘loophole’ involving Donald Trump Jr.
• He later states he is not a professor and does not have a PhD, framing titles as ‘gatekeeping’ and urging prediction-based accountability.