← All stories
Politics

Trump-Appointed Judge Votes Against Trump in Unanimous Kennedy Center Ruling

MeidasTouch · Trump CAUGHT with ZERO EVIDENCE by ALL THREE JUDGES · July 11, 2026
Trump-Appointed Judge Votes Against Trump in Unanimous Kennedy Center Ruling
MeidasTouch
MeidasTouch
Trump CAUGHT with ZERO EVIDENCE by ALL THREE JUDGES
"3 judges: Judge Millett, Judge Wilkins, and Judge Katzas. Judge Millett and Judge Wilkins appointed by Barack Obama. They came on the court together. Katzas appointed by Trump in his first term, but no dissent from Katzas here."
The D.C. Court of Appeals unanimously denied Trump's motion to keep his name on the Kennedy Center, with Trump-appointed Judge Katzas joining two Obama appointees in the 3-0 decision. The panel found Trump failed to demonstrate irreparable harm with facts or evidence, noting his name had already been removed and millions in donations had been collected. The court rejected arguments about a newly formed Trump Kennedy Center Foundation having to return donations, calling it a post hoc argument never raised in district court.

About this episode

Legal analyst Michael Popock reports on a significant legal defeat for Donald Trump in his effort to restore his name to the Kennedy Center, with a federal appeals panel unanimously denying his emergency motion in a 3-0 decision. The D.C. Court of Appeals ruling is particularly notable because it includes Trump-appointed Judge Katzas joining two Obama appointees in rejecting Trump's arguments. The panel found Trump failed to provide facts or evidence demonstrating irreparable harm from the removal of his name, which had already occurred following District Court Judge Cooper's earlier ruling. Judge Cooper had ordered Trump's name removed from the Kennedy Center facade and website, finding it violated the organic statute establishing the center as a living memorial to President John F. Kennedy. The appeals court rejected Trump's argument that a newly created Trump Kennedy Center Foundation would have to return donations, calling it a post hoc argument never raised in district court. Popock draws parallels between the Kennedy Center foundation and Trump's alleged pattern of creating intermediary foundations to divert congressionally appropriated funds, citing the Freedom 250 fund as another example where House Democrats claim phony wire instructions were used to redirect money from the bipartisan America 250 Fund. The court noted that the Kennedy Center had already amassed millions in contributions despite Trump's name removal, contradicting claims of financial harm. Judge Cooper retains jurisdiction over additional matters including supervision of Kennedy Center operations and Representative Joyce Beatty's restoration to the board. The unanimous ruling, including from a judge potentially auditioning for the Supreme Court, represents a significant setback for Trump's attempt to maintain his legacy presence at the iconic Washington venue.

Key takeaways

More stories More from MeidasTouch