Russell Brand episode claims UK put £1bn into Moderna plant and a decade of purchases
"And the British government have actually committed to buy these products for the next 10 years. Now, they're not tried, they're not tested. We don't know about the efficacy. We don't know about the adverse reactions. But hey, we're going to buy them anyway."
About this episode
This 83-second excerpt focuses on claims about the UK government’s relationship with Moderna and the scale of planned mRNA vaccine manufacturing and purchasing. One speaker says the British government has entered a joint agreement with Moderna and, “as far as we know”, has put £1bn into a plant being developed near Oxford. The facility is described as being scheduled to produce 250 million doses per year, using mRNA-based technologies, including vaccines for Covid-19 and candidates for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).
The speaker argues that mRNA technology is being “rolled… out” despite limited information available to the public, adding that what is known leaves them “somewhat uncomfortable”. They then allege that the government has committed to buying these products for the next 10 years, characterising the vaccines as “not tried” and “not tested”, and asserting uncertainty about efficacy and adverse reactions.
A second voice responds by speculating that a £1bn investment would be expected to “pay off”, but says the described commitments and volumes suggest the doses will “one way or another… get used”. No documents, dates, or official sources are cited in the clip, and the claims are presented as commentary rather than evidenced reporting.
Key takeaways
- A speaker claims the UK government has a joint agreement with Moderna and has invested £1bn in a facility near Oxford.
- The plant is described as being scheduled to produce 250 million mRNA vaccine doses each year.
- The products mentioned include Covid-19 vaccines and mRNA candidates for influenza and RSV.
- The speaker alleges the UK has committed to buying Moderna products for the next 10 years.
- They argue there is limited public information on the technology and raise concerns about efficacy and adverse reactions.
- A second speaker suggests the investment is expected to pay off, but implies the scale of procurement means doses will be used regardless.