Congressman Jackson says Nolan Wells case echoes Emmett Till, urges federal probe
"Well, this is also as we speak today the uh anniversary the the date of IT Hill's birth. And so I come from Chicago and that was a Mississippi case. So history is repeating itself again."
About this episode
In this short segment, Megyn Kelly plays audio from an interview with “Congressman Jackson” about Nolan Wells and criticises his handling of the case and its racial framing. In the clip, Jackson describes a scenario involving “five or seven young white guys” and “one… black” child, then links the case to Emmett Till by noting what he calls the anniversary of Till’s birth and asserting that “history is repeating itself”. Jackson alleges that those around Wells “know something” and have not been “thoroughly interrogated”, claims they are “lawyered up” and connected to family members who are judges, and argues the state “has not lifted a finger”. He calls for an “independent investigation” and says he would like to see a federal investigation.
Kelly responds by calling the comparison “so irresponsible”, disputing Jackson’s implication that police have not pursued the case. She says police have stated witnesses were cooperating and argues Jackson provides no specific, named evidence to support claims of a “pattern of deception and denial”. Kelly frames the remarks as an attempt to inject race into the situation and warns it risks unfairly presuming wrongdoing by the missing child’s white friends based on skin colour alone.
Key takeaways
- “Congressman Jackson” compares the Nolan Wells case to Emmett Till and says “history is repeating itself”.
- Jackson calls for an “independent investigation” and says he would like a federal investigation.
- Jackson alleges key youths “know something”, are “lawyered up”, and have not been “thoroughly interrogated”.
- Jackson claims the state “has not lifted a finger” in pursuing the case.
- Megyn Kelly calls the comparison “so irresponsible” and says no specific instances of “deception and denial” are identified in the clip.
- Kelly argues the remarks unfairly racialise the case by focusing on the friends’ race.