Schlichter says US strategic goal in Iran should be regime change
"The strategic goal has to be regime change. And that's why I was so happy to hear he's bringing Israel back. uh or at least that's the reporting that he wants Israel to join in because Israel's got uh networks and resources inside the country that may be able to help finally destabilize this tyrannical apocalyptic uh savage government."
About this episode
Batya Sargon debates Kurt Schlichter over whether Donald Trump has a clear plan heading into November, focusing on the political fallout of rising living costs and a claimed renewed US military engagement with Iran. Sargon argues the White House has not sufficiently explained how it intends to contain Iran while also delivering lower energy prices, and says the administration failed to prepare for predictable pressure around the Strait of Hormuz.
Schlichter, a retired US Army colonel and Townhall columnist, says Trump is an instinct-driven politician who dislikes formal planning, but argues the Iran threat outweighs immediate fuel-price concerns. He disputes that Iran “controls” Hormuz, describing intermittent attacks as tactically manageable, but alleges — without evidence — that unnamed US “allies” may be leaning on insurance companies not to insure ships, worsening disruption.
He also sets out a maximalist end-state: that the strategic goal should be regime change in Iran, ideally via covert efforts and Israeli networks rather than US ground forces. The pair then turn to domestic economics: both describe sticker shock on food, electricity and housing, and Sargon criticises Republicans for lacking concrete proposals on prices. Schlichter floats potential priorities including repealing Obamacare, reducing student-loan distortions, and needing more time for an economic programme he likens to Reagan-era policy. He also claims Trump discussed an agreement with electricity producers not to raise rates due to AI and data-centre demand, which Sargon challenges as insufficiently consumer-focused.
Key takeaways
- Sargon says Trump has not articulated a public plan to reconcile Iran policy with lowering living costs before November.
- Schlichter calls Trump an instinct-led leader who resists formal planning, but says the Iran nuclear threat is the higher priority.
- Schlichter alleges (without offering evidence) that unnamed US allies may be pressuring insurers not to cover ships, exacerbating Gulf shipping disruption.
- Schlichter argues the strategic objective in Iran should be regime change and proposes covert action with Israeli resources rather than US boots on the ground.
- Sargon presses Republicans for specific cost-of-living proposals on groceries, utilities, healthcare and housing, warning they could lose midterms without them.
- Schlichter says Republicans should explicitly push to repeal Obamacare and criticises government-backed student loans as inflationary for tuition.
- Schlichter claims Trump discussed an agreement with electricity producers to avoid raising rates because of AI/data-centre power demand; Sargon says AI firms should bear more of the cost.