AI & Tech

Krassensteins predict AI will permanently erase jobs and require new redistribution

Name: Krassensteins predict AI will permanently erase jobs and require new redistribution
Uploaded: 2026-07-23T10:47:00+00:00
Description: Ed Krassenstein argues that AI, combined with robotics and automation, will reduce demand for human labour in a way prior technological shifts did not, and says the US should treat AI more like a shared national resource than a normal innovation. He cites Andrew Yang’s past calls to prepare for disruption and suggests society will need mechanisms to ensure the public shares in AI-driven gains.

CUOMO · The Krassensteins Are Overshooting On Trump · July 23, 2026

CUOMO

The Krassensteins Are Overshooting On Trump

"This is different because this actually is going to take human jobs. And I don't think jobs are going to rebound after that because when you team AI with robotics and automation, it's going to be a do everything humans can at a much faster rate and it it's going to be able to do a much better job."

Ed Krassenstein argues that AI, combined with robotics and automation, will reduce demand for human labour in a way prior technological shifts did not, and says the US should treat AI more like a shared national resource than a normal innovation. He cites Andrew Yang’s past calls to prepare for disruption and suggests society will need mechanisms to ensure the public shares in AI-driven gains.

About this episode

Chris Cuomo interviews social-media influencers Brian and Ed Krassenstein about Democratic messaging, the midterm landscape, and how fast-moving news cycles shape political attention. A major thread is AI policy: the Krassensteins argue AI combined with robotics will displace human labour more permanently than past innovations, and Cuomo presses the idea that AI should be treated like a public resource. The discussion includes proposals ranging from heavy regulation and export controls to public access models and government equity stakes in large AI firms; Brian Krassenstein suggests a non-voting public stake so Americans can share in profits without day-to-day government control.

The conversation shifts to immigration enforcement and public accountability. Brian Krassenstein describes “masked agents” and fatal incidents as government overreach and argues the lack of clear identification and body-camera footage fuels fears of unaccountable policing. Cuomo challenges elements of the framing and raises uncertainty about the facts in a Maine incident discussed by the guests, while both guests argue the episode could become politically damaging for Senator Susan Collins.

Cuomo and the guests also debate voter ID and mail voting. Cuomo argues the simplicity of “ID for voting” is politically potent, while the Krassensteins warn of disenfranchisement and practical hurdles tied to citizenship verification. Late in the episode, Cuomo criticises the two-party primary system and calls for reforms such as top-two/top-four primaries, national rules on gerrymandering, and potentially a constitutional convention to address structural issues including the electoral college.

Key takeaways

Cuomo advances a framing of AI as a public resource requiring regulation and broad public benefit, not just a private-sector innovation.
Ed Krassenstein predicts AI plus robotics will eliminate jobs without the typical rebound in new roles seen after earlier technological shifts.
Brian Krassenstein proposes the US taking non-voting equity stakes in top AI firms, with returns benefiting the public or reducing national debt.
The guests allege anonymous or masked enforcement actions and lack of body cameras are creating perceptions of unaccountable policing; Cuomo disputes aspects and notes gaps in confirmed facts discussed on-air.
Cuomo and the Krassensteins argue voter-ID politics are easy to sell but harder to implement without disenfranchising legitimate voters; they defend mail voting as participation-expanding.
Cuomo calls for structural political reforms to weaken party control over primaries and reduce gerrymandering, suggesting national rule-making or a constitutional convention.