Dwarkesh Patel Podcast
Episode overview

Ada Palmer – Machiavelli is the most misunderstood thinker of all time

Dwarkesh Patel Podcast · 5 Egleze moments
Ada Palmer – Machiavelli is the most misunderstood thinker of all time
Episode summary

Host Dwarkesh Patel interviews Ada Palmer, science fiction author, composer, and University of Chicago historian, for an extended discussion of Machiavelli's political thought and the chaotic world of Renaissance Italy that produced The Prince. Palmer reveals Machiavelli was physically present at Cesare Borgia's infamous massacre at Senigallia, where conspirators were slaughtered at a banquet after false forgiveness, with Machiavelli's family waiting months to learn if he survived. The conversation explores why Italy was uniquely unstable in Machiavelli's era: rapid papal turnover created unpredictable regime changes every decade, while the breakdown of long-standing city-state governments triggered cascading instability. Palmer argues Machiavelli was an extreme patriot who refused lucrative foreign employment after torture and exile, writing The Prince as a secret job application only for Florence's rulers, not for wide circulation. The discussion examines how Renaissance scholarship required disguising original ideas as commentaries on ancient texts, why patronage networks were considered stability mechanisms rather than corruption, and how Florence's cultural output functioned as cheaper-than-war diplomatic strategy against militarily superior powers. Palmer traces modern copyright law to Inquisition censorship requirements and describes how Romans rioted demanding more nepotism when a pope appointed a competent general instead of his incompetent son. The episode distinguishes between the historical Machiavelli—a selfless patriot—and 'Machiavellian' as a cultural character representing amoral self-interest, explaining how this doubling shapes political thought today.

Key points
Watch original episode More from Dwarkesh Patel Podcast

5 moments from this episode

Source-linked · editorially selected
01
History

Renaissance Scholar Forged Archaeological Digs to Make Original Ideas Appear Ancient

Palmer describes how Renaissance scholar Aeneas of Viterbo conducted fake archaeological excavations, burying artifacts he created and then 'discovering' them publicly to lend authority to his historical theories. This extreme example illustrates how Renaissance intellectual culture valued ancient authority over originality, forcing scholars to disguise innovation as rediscovery.

Read this moment →
02
History

Machiavelli Copied Entire Lucretius Poem by Hand Despite Print Copies Existing

Palmer describes a Vatican Library manuscript where Machiavelli hand-copied Lucretius's entire poem despite printed editions existing, creating a hybrid text superior to both print and manuscript sources. This reveals the parallel coexistence of manuscript and print technologies in the early 16th century and Machiavelli's scholarly method of synthesizing multiple textual traditions.

Read this moment →
04
History

Palmer Reveals Machiavelli Witnessed Borgia Massacre While Working as Florence's Diplomat

Ada Palmer, historian at the University of Chicago, reveals Machiavelli was physically present at Cesare Borgia's infamous massacre at Senigallia, where Borgia invited conspirators to a banquet under false forgiveness and slaughtered them. Palmer describes how Machiavelli's family had no idea if he survived for months afterward, waiting in fear. This firsthand proximity to extreme political violence directly shaped The Prince.

Read this moment →
05
History

Palmer Argues Inquisition Invented Copyright Law to Enable Book Censorship

Palmer traces modern copyright law directly to the Catholic Inquisition's post-1515 requirement that all books receive pre-publication approval. In exchange for submitting to censorship, printers received monopoly licenses enforceable through Inquisition authority. England and other nations then copied this system, originally seeking to replicate the censorship mechanism but eventually separating copyright from prior restraint.

Read this moment →