Culture Apothecary with Alex Clark
Episode overview

I Was Put on Psychiatric Drugs at 7…I’m Still Paying the Price | Danielle Gansky

Culture Apothecary with Alex Clark · 14 August 2026 · 1h 4m · 4 Egleze moments
I Was Put on Psychiatric Drugs at 7…I’m Still Paying the Price | Danielle Gansky ▶

What happened in this episode?

Alex Clark interviews Danielle Gansky, who says she was first medicated for ADHD at age seven after a teacher raised concerns, and that clinicians subsequently added antidepressants, benzodiazepines, mood stabilisers and antipsychotics before she turned ten. Gansky alleges her parents were not given sufficient information to provide informed consent, and argues that long-term effects of antidepressants on the developing brain are not well studied.

Gansky describes persistent cognitive and emotional symptoms she attributes to long-term SSRI exposure and withdrawal, including memory lapses, difficulty reading and a reduced “inner dialogue”. She recounts being tapered off antidepressants over six weeks in her early twenties, which she says followed standard practice but precipitated a severe withdrawal crisis leaving her bedbound, in emergency departments, and later back on medication. She alleges multiple clinicians dismissed withdrawal as relapse or misdiagnosed it as a mood disorder, and says an antipsychotic trial caused a severe adverse reaction.

The conversation turns to post-SSRI sexual dysfunction (PSSD). Gansky claims there is no FDA label warning for potentially persistent sexual and emotional effects, and alleges a citizen petition seeking updated warnings went unanswered for years. She also says HHS and “SAMA” are convening a technical expert panel to develop tapering guidance and that she served on it. Clark adds her own views on informed consent and pregnancy while on SSRIs; these are presented as opinion rather than clinical guidance.

What are the key points?

Which topics are covered?

How is this page sourced?

Programme
Culture Apothecary with Alex Clark
Published
14 August 2026
Duration
1h 4m
Original episode
Open the original source ↗

Egleze verifies the speaker, source and timestamp for each linked moment. Unless a moment is explicitly marked independently verified, statements remain attributed claims by the named speaker rather than established facts.

Watch original episode More from Culture Apothecary with Alex Clark

4 moments from this episode

Source-linked · editorially selected
01
Health, Longevity & Biohacking

Danielle Gansky says she was prescribed multiple psychiatric drugs before age 10

at 4:22 · Attributed speaker claim
And so that quickly spiraled into a cascade of anti-depressants, benzoazipines, mood stabilizers, and antiscychotics. All before I was in uh even 10 years old.

Danielle Gansky tells host Alex Clark she was first placed on ADHD stimulants at age seven after a teacher suggested an evaluation, then says clinicians added antidepressants and other psychiatric drugs in quick succession. She frames the early polypharmacy as the beginning of harm she says has followed her into adulthood.

02
Health, Longevity & Biohacking

Gansky alleges parents were not told long-term SSRI effects in children are unknown

at 6:39 · Attributed speaker claim
My parents were never given the information needed to make a truly informed decision on my behalf. So my entire brain development happened under the influence of psychiatric drugs. No one told my parents that the long-term effects of anti-depressants on the developing brain had never been properly studied and it's really unknown and essentially we're conducting a mass experiment on children's developing brains with little understanding of the long-term consequences.

Gansky argues her parents did not receive what she considers adequate risk information when she was medicated as a child, and claims long-term effects on developing brains were not properly studied. She characterises widespread paediatric prescribing as an uncontrolled experiment, a framing that is disputed within psychiatry and regulation.

03
Health, Longevity & Biohacking

Gansky claims FDA petition on post-SSRI sexual dysfunction warnings went unanswered for years

at 47:36 · Attributed speaker claim
They told the FDA, you need to update your warning labels like so patients can probably uh properly be warned. Um, so under federal law, the FDA was required to respond to this petition within 180 days. Instead, the petition went un unanswered for more than six years.

Discussing post-SSRI sexual dysfunction (PSSD), Gansky says researchers filed a citizen petition asking the US Food and Drug Administration to add label warnings about potentially lasting sexual side-effects after discontinuation. She claims the FDA did not respond within the statutory timeline and that subsequent legal efforts did not resolve the warning issue.

04
Health, Longevity & Biohacking

Gansky says she served on HHS–SAMHSA antidepressant tapering panel

at 50:01 · Attributed speaker claim
So the good news is that this is finally beginning to change. Like, thanks to Secretary Kennedy's leadership, HHS and SAMHSA actually are convening a technical expert panel of clinicians, researchers, and patients to help develop evidence-based guidelines for clinicians to help patients safely taper off antidepressants. I was actually part of that panel, and I was very honored to be there.

Gansky says HHS and SAMHSA are convening a technical expert panel to develop evidence-based guidance for clinicians on tapering patients off antidepressants. She says she served on the panel and links the effort to Secretary Kennedy’s leadership.