Mike Ritland interviews former Marine Recon sniper and Navy SEAL Mike Sarraille about moving from DEVGRU to Army Delta Force (CAG/KAG) and what he perceived as the practical differences between the two tier-one units. Sarraille says that during his Delta in-brief he was surprised by the unit’s smaller size and what he understood to be comparatively limited support personnel, which he attributes to the Army having to spread enablers across Special Forces, aviation and Ranger formations, unlike DEVGRU’s access to broader Navy resourcing.
On tactics, Sarraille describes differences in close-quarters approaches, saying Delta favoured speed and “going to the X” more often, while his DEVGRU experience leaned towards offsets while still aiming for speed, surprise and violence of action. He and Ritland also discuss how early-war training and real-world operations diverged, and Sarraille recalls feeling unprepared on first entering a combat zone despite extensive training, arguing that adaptation and reflection are essential as adversaries evolve.
The conversation then turns to training pipelines and culture. Sarraille credits Marine Corps discipline and prior selection experiences with helping him through BUD/S, while noting SEAL culture’s tendency to question authority can drive rapid innovation. He highlights mentorship from senior leaders, naming Admiral Mark Schaefer and former DEVGRU commander Chris Fussell, whom he praises for weekly leadership sessions and a mentoring letter that, Sarraille says, included candid criticism of aspects of the special operations community and a warning against careerism overriding integrity.
Mike Sarraille says he was told on arriving at Delta Force that it was about half the size of DEVGRU and short of support personnel. He says Delta, unlike DEVGRU, has to compete inside the Army for enablers with units including the Green Berets, TF-160th, the Rangers and PSYOPS.
Read this moment →