Prince Harry Identifies Occupation as Duke Despite Claims of Rejecting Royal Life
"Occupation. Uh, full-time dad. Uh, British Army veteran, Prince of England, Duke. But, uh, for today um, I don't know. What do you want? Duke. We go with the Duke. Yeah."
About this episode
Megyn Kelly and royal commentator Rob discuss Prince Harry's resounding legal defeat against Associated Newspapers and the Daily Mail, where the Duke of Sussex accused journalists of using illegal means to obtain stories about his personal life over an 18-year period. The judge dismissed all claims from Harry and other celebrity plaintiffs including Elton John and Elizabeth Hurley after reporters testified they used legitimate journalism methods. Under UK law where the losing party typically pays legal costs, Harry now faces potentially millions in fees, with Associated Newspapers reportedly having spent up to 50 million pounds defending the case. The discussion reveals Harry's pattern of blaming media and others for his problems, with sources indicating he ignored legal advice warning him the case was nearly impossible to win. Harry responded to the loss by calling the 400-page judicial decision a complete whitewash and demanding justice, language considered inappropriate for a royal addressing the courts. In a revealing July 13 podcast appearance just after the ruling, Harry listed his occupation as Duke of England when asked by host Joe Marlor, exposing the contradiction between his public rejection of royal life after relocating to America and his continued identification with royal status. Kelly and her guest compare Harry to Blake Lively in terms of litigation tendencies and discuss how his privileged upbringing means he has never faced real accountability until this court defeat. The commentators argue Harry's inability to move past decades-old grievances, combined with his refusal to accept that media attention is both a blessing and burden of royal privilege, has led to this expensive and humiliating legal failure that Britain's backlogged court system could ill afford to adjudicate.
Key takeaways
- Prince Harry lost his lawsuit against Daily Mail and Associated Newspapers, with the judge dismissing all claims of illegal information gathering over 18 years of reporting.
- Harry faces potentially millions in legal costs under UK law where losing parties pay, with Associated Newspapers having reportedly spent up to 50 million pounds defending the case.
- Sources indicate Harry ignored legal advice warning him the case was nearly impossible to prove and win before proceeding with the lawsuit.
- Harry called the judicial decision a complete whitewash and said justice was not served, language considered inappropriate for a royal addressing the courts.
- On a July 13 podcast, Harry identified his occupation as Duke despite publicly rejecting royal duties and relocating to America with Meghan Markle.
- The lawsuit targeted individual journalists over stories from decades ago, including coverage from when Harry dated Chelsea Davy and other early relationships.
- Commentators argue Harry has never faced real accountability in his life and blames media and family for all his problems rather than accepting responsibility.