← All stories
Crime & Justice

Defense Argues Broadcasting Defendant's Statements Violates Constitutional Rights

Reality Check with Ross Coulthart · Watch live: Day 3 preliminary hearing for accused Charlie Kirk killer · July 8, 2026
Defense Argues Broadcasting Defendant's Statements Violates Constitutional Rights
Reality Check with Ross Coulthart
Reality Check with Ross Coulthart
Watch live: Day 3 preliminary hearing for accused Charlie Kirk killer
"The United States Supreme Court said in Estes versus Texas that the televising of a defendant in the act of confessing to a crime was inherently invalid under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, even without a showing of prejudice."
Defense attorney Novak argued that broadcasting portions of witness statements containing alleged confessions by Robinson violates his 14th Amendment due process rights, citing Supreme Court precedent. The defense requested exhibits containing such statements not be televised during the preliminary hearing to preserve Robinson's right to a fair trial.

About this episode

This preliminary hearing session in the Tyler Robinson UVU campus shooting case centered on heated constitutional disputes over what evidence can be broadcast to the public. SBI Agent Brian Davis testified extensively about the investigation, revealing that Robinson voluntarily surrendered at Washington County Sheriff's Office on September 11, 2025, arriving around 9 PM with his parents and family friend Mike Mitchell. Robinson was formally arrested at 4 AM on September 12 and transported to Utah County Jail. The court heard that Robinson's roommate Lance Twiggs was granted use immunity by both the Utah County Attorney's Office and U.S. Attorney's Office before providing a video-recorded interview on April 20, 2026, taken in lieu of his testimony at the preliminary hearing. The session became dominated by extensive legal argument over whether Twiggs' recorded interview and other exhibits containing alleged statements by Robinson could be broadcast during the televised hearing. Defense attorney Michael Novak argued that broadcasting what prosecutors will characterize as confessions violates Robinson's 14th Amendment due process rights, citing the Supreme Court's Estes v. Texas decision. The prosecution sought to play the audio of the interview while keeping visual exhibits off camera, while media attorneys and the Kirk family's representative argued for full transparency. Judge [name not stated] ultimately ruled that Twiggs' entire interview is admitted into evidence for the court's consideration but ordered specific portions redacted from public broadcast, from timestamp 6:56 to 20:27 and 32:55 to 35:48, citing Rule 403 concerns about cumulative evidence given that text messages may be separately introduced. The judge emphasized balancing transparency with constitutional rights to a fair trial, acknowledging the difficulty of the task. Agent Davis also testified that a live, unfired .223 caliber round was found on the UVU Computer Science Building roof, though there was no line of sight from that location to victim Charlie Kirk's position. The hearing adjourned early to allow the state to prepare redacted video exhibits overnight, with proceedings set to resume at 9 AM the following day.

Key takeaways

More stories More from Reality Check with Ross Coulthart