← All stories
Media & Journalism

Director Admits Controversial Vigilante Film Targets Conservative MAGA Audience for Profit

Piers Morgan Uncensored · ‘WHY Is Elon Musk Promoting THIS?’ Citizen Vigilante Director vs Mehdi Hasan · July 2, 2026
Director Admits Controversial Vigilante Film Targets Conservative MAGA Audience for Profit
Piers Morgan Uncensored
Piers Morgan Uncensored
‘WHY Is Elon Musk Promoting THIS?’ Citizen Vigilante Director vs Mehdi Hasan
"I make movies, and if the movie gets hated and loved, right, and whoever it is, it's like not under my control. You know, I think my Run movie was a very solid quality movie, what showed empathy for migrants. And did somebody give a shit? No. Did I get hailed by the whatever? Netflix bought the movie for $20 million? No. So, and that's the thing, I make movies, and by the way, I did that with my own money, uh, and I need an audience."
Director Uwe Boll acknowledged that Citizen Vigilante was deliberately crafted to appeal to conservative Republican audiences after his previous pro-migrant film Run failed commercially. Boll, who called Trump a 'fascist' and Fox News a 'fascist channel' just years ago, now defends the film's anti-migrant themes. Mehdi Hasan argued this represents a cynical pivot to capitalize on right-wing sentiment, with Boll admitting he 'goes where the audiences are' rather than maintaining consistent principles.

About this episode

Piers Morgan hosts a heated debate about the controversial film Citizen Vigilante between its director Uwe Boll and journalist Mehdi Hasan, centering on whether the movie constitutes dangerous propaganda or legitimate artistic expression. The film, starring Armie Hammer as a U.S. veteran who murders Muslim migrants in Europe, has been catapulted to number one on digital purchase charts after aggressive promotion by Elon Musk to his 240 million Twitter followers. Hasan reveals that Musk has retweeted accounts calling the film's climactic scene—where the protagonist executes an entire Syrian refugee family—a 'moderate response,' and has discussed funding a sequel. The movie is reportedly banned in several countries for inciting violence. Boll defends the film as a reaction to what he views as out-of-control migration and inadequate prosecution of migrant crime in Europe, arguing it reflects legitimate public frustration with establishment politics. He dismisses criticism from reviewers who have called it fascist propaganda and the worst film of the year. Hasan counters that the film is being weaponized by the American right during a period of actual anti-Muslim violence in Scotland, England, Germany, and the United States. He argues Boll has cynically abandoned his previously empathetic stance on migrants—evidenced by his 2023 film Run—to chase a MAGA audience after commercial failure. The debate reveals Boll previously criticized Trump as a fascist liar but now softens his stance, admitting he needs to find audiences for his self-financed films. Right-wing commentator Patrick Bet-David is shown predicting the film will inspire real vigilante attacks in Europe. The exchange exposes tensions between artistic freedom, commercial incentives, and responsibility for real-world consequences when inflammatory content is amplified by the world's richest and most followed man on social media.

Key takeaways

More stories More from Piers Morgan Uncensored