← All stories
Geopolitics

Iran Used Only 40 Percent of Offensive Capability During Recent War With US

Breaking Points · Vance Hints RELOADING OIL For RESTART Of War · July 2, 2026
Iran Used Only 40 Percent of Offensive Capability During Recent War With US
Breaking Points
Breaking Points
Vance Hints RELOADING OIL For RESTART Of War
"The Iranians tell me that they've only used about 40% of their offensive capability against Israel during the war because they didn't need to because Hezbollah was so active. And this diverted Israeli forces and defense capabilities because they had to face that front from Hezbollah as well."
Trita Parsi disclosed that Iranian officials told him Tehran deployed only 40 percent of its offensive capabilities during the recent conflict because Hezbollah's involvement was so effective at diverting Israeli resources. This revelation contradicts public perceptions about Iran's military performance and suggests the Islamic Republic retained significant military capacity in reserve. Parsi explained that Hezbollah's role has been vastly underreported due to Israeli censorship during the war.

About this episode

Breaking Points hosts interview Trita Parsi of the Quincy Institute about the current state of US-Iran negotiations and the prospects for renewed conflict in the Middle East. The discussion centers on Vice President JD Vance's revelation that the Trump administration is using the ceasefire pause to refill global oil markets before determining whether diplomacy will succeed with Iran. Parsi provides significant new intelligence, including that Iranian officials told him Tehran used only 40 percent of its offensive military capability during the recent war because Hezbollah's involvement was so effective at diverting Israeli resources. The expert reveals that Iran believes Prime Minister Netanyahu will launch another attack before Israel's October elections to avoid losing immunity from corruption charges and potentially going to jail. Parsi analyzes the recent US-brokered Israeli-Lebanese agreement as potentially sabotaging the broader memorandum of understanding with Iran, suggesting internal Trump administration divisions between Vance and Secretary of State Rubio. The conversation explores secondary economic impacts beyond oil, including critical fertilizer shortages affecting global agriculture. Parsi also discusses how Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states are hedging their bets by striking separate deals with Iran and deepening relations with China, having been disappointed by US military performance and increasingly viewing Washington as an unreliable partner. Despite repeated disruptions and attacks from both sides, Parsi concludes that neither the US nor Iran truly wants full-scale war and that diplomatic talks, while fragile, have not collapsed entirely.

Key takeaways

More stories More from Breaking Points