← All stories
Politics

Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Firing Power Sparks Liberal Justice Dissent

CUOMO · The One Institution Trump Can’t Control · July 2, 2026
Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Firing Power Sparks Liberal Justice Dissent
CUOMO
CUOMO
The One Institution Trump Can’t Control
"The court ruled that the president has the power to remove leaders of certain independent agencies like the Fed. 6-3, which means all of the liberal justices were against it."
Chris Cuomo argues the Supreme Court made the right decision in Trump v. Slaughter, ruling 6-3 that presidents can fire heads of executive agencies, though with some due process requirements. The decision emphasized the Constitution's vesting of executive power in the president. All three liberal justices dissented, seeking to limit presidential authority over independent agencies.

About this episode

Chris Cuomo delivers a sweeping defense of American democracy on its 250th anniversary, arguing that the United States remains the world's oldest functioning representative constitutional democracy and that the judiciary is the most reliable branch of government. Host Chris Cuomo systematically dismantles comparisons to other nations, noting the UK still has a monarchy, France's tumultuous revolutionary history, and Germany's relatively recent democratic establishment. He dedicates the bulk of the episode to analyzing recent Supreme Court decisions, arguing that despite their unpopularity with both Trump and progressives, they represent sound constitutional reasoning. On Trump v. Slaughter, Cuomo supports the 6-3 ruling granting presidents broad authority to fire agency heads, though he opposes how Trump exercises that power. He strongly defends the 6-3 birthright citizenship decision in Trump v. Barbara, calling it constitutionally obvious despite political objections. The transgender sports case receives qualified support, with Cuomo arguing the legal reasoning is sound even as he criticizes the political emphasis on a statistically tiny issue. Most notably, Cuomo highlights Justice Amy Coney Barrett's 5-4 decision allowing mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to arrive days later, calling it a crucial check on Republican voter suppression efforts. Throughout, Cuomo emphasizes that judicial precedent and constitutional fidelity matter more than political expedience, contrasting the judiciary's relative restraint with Congress's paralysis and executive overreach. He openly wrestles with personal existential questions at 56, uncertain of his professional future, while maintaining optimism about America's trajectory despite current political dysfunction.

Key takeaways

More stories More from CUOMO