← All stories
Science

New Study Shows Human and Chimp Proteins Decidedly Different Despite Gene Similarity

Pints with Aquinas · Stephen Meyer DESTROYS Atheist TikToks | Last Call Ep. 18 · June 11, 2026
New Study Shows Human and Chimp Proteins Decidedly Different Despite Gene Similarity
Pints with Aquinas
Pints with Aquinas
Stephen Meyer DESTROYS Atheist TikToks | Last Call Ep. 18
"The proteins that are built from the genes are very, very different between humans and chimps. That's a new study that's come out with a Brazilian group in a top biology journal showing that the proteome of humans and chimps is decidedly different, suggesting that the way the genetic information is processed in humans and chimps is decidedly different."
Meyer cites recent Brazilian research published in a major biology journal showing human and chimp proteomes are fundamentally different, undermining the long-held claim of 98% genetic similarity. This challenges the common ancestry argument and suggests information processing mechanisms between species are distinct. The finding has implications for evolutionary biology's central claims about human origins.

About this episode

In this episode of Pints with Aquinas, host Matt Fradd sits down with philosopher of science Stephen Meyer to respond to atheist TikTok arguments and promote Meyer's new film 'The Story of Everything.' The conversation centers on Meyer systematically dismantling objections from prominent atheists including Christopher Hitchens, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Ricky Gervais, and Alex O'Connor. Meyer leads with perhaps his most newsworthy claim: that he and German paleontologist Gunter Bechly have documented 17 major fossil explosions showing abrupt appearance of organism groups with no evolutionary precursors, directly contradicting gradual Darwinian evolution. He also cites new Brazilian research showing human and chimp proteomes are fundamentally different, undermining the 98% genetic similarity argument for common ancestry. On philosophical grounds, Meyer argues the multiverse hypothesis fails because any universe-generating mechanism would itself require fine-tuning, creating an infinite regress. He defends biblical theism against the problem of evil by arguing Scripture uniquely predicts both design and decay in nature, matching what scientists observe at the genomic level. Meyer's responses emphasize three scientific discoveries pointing to God: the Big Bang, cosmic fine-tuning, and digital information in DNA. Throughout, Meyer positions theism as providing superior explanatory power for moral objectivity, consciousness, and biological complexity compared to naturalism. The episode serves as both an apologetics masterclass and promotional vehicle for Meyer's film adapting his book 'Return of the God Hypothesis.'

Key takeaways

More stories More from Pints with Aquinas