Daniel Unveils Hellfire Argument Claiming Jesus Failed Divine Worthiness Test

What was said

"Only when God will show a group of men into hell, will those men be convinced that he existed. Jesus comes in the first century, does a lot of love and everything, but it's not good enough to prove that he was divine. Once failed, failed forever."

Muslim debater Daniel introduced what he called the 'Hellfire argument for God,' asserting that no divine claim can be validated unless the claimant judges humanity and condemns people to hell. He argued that Jesus's first-century ministry, lacking final judgment, represents a 'catastrophic mistake' and failure of divine worthiness. This heterodox theological position attacks the core Christian narrative by asserting that miracles, resurrection, and teaching are insufficient proofs of divinity without immediate eschatological judgment.