← All stories
History

Nick Hanauer Claims Economic Theory Dating to 1879 Was Designed to Prevent Worker Revolts

Diary of a CEO · Death of the Middle Class: Billionaire vs Entrepreneur DEBATE - Daniel Priestley v Nick Hanauer · June 8, 2026
Nick Hanauer Claims Economic Theory Dating to 1879 Was Designed to Prevent Worker Revolts
Diary of a CEO
Diary of a CEO
Death of the Middle Class: Billionaire vs Entrepreneur DEBATE - Daniel Priestley v Nick Hanauer
"J.P. Morgan brings this guy, John Bates Clark, to Columbia University and says, fix this. And so Henry George writes a book called The Distribution of Wealth, in which he invents this idea called theory of marginal productivity. But he says the quiet part out loud in the book. He says, look, we have to prove to working people that no matter how much they make, whether it's a little or a lot, it reflects their value. Because if they conclude that their work is worth more than they are paid, they will revolt and kill us all."
Hanauer revealed that the theory of marginal productivity—which asserts that wages reflect workers' true value—was explicitly invented in 1879 to prevent labor revolts. He claims J.P. Morgan commissioned economist John Bates Clark to create this theory after Henry George's bestselling book about rich stealing from the poor threatened the status quo. This theory remains central to modern economics despite its origin as a tool to suppress worker demands.

About this episode

On this episode of The Diary of a CEO, host Steven Bartlett convened a high-stakes debate between billionaire entrepreneur and civic capitalist Nick Hanauer and serial entrepreneur Dan Priestley on how to solve the deepening inequality crisis in Western economies. Hanauer, who co-founded Amazon and sold his company for $6.4 billion, argued that 50 years of neoliberal policy—cutting taxes for the rich, deregulating corporations, and suppressing wages—has transferred trillions from workers to the top 1%, with the median US worker earning half what they would have if they'd maintained their 1975 share of GDP. He called for progressive minimum wages, higher corporate taxes, antitrust enforcement, and even government ownership of 50% of AI companies to prevent oligarchy and revolt. Priestley, who has worked with 5,500 businesses globally, countered that the UK already has strong worker protections yet suffers stagnant growth and widespread unhappiness, arguing the real culprits are mega-corporations and mega-funds financializing homes and dodging taxes. He proposed tilting policy aggressively toward small businesses, sovereign wealth funds, and broad asset ownership—houses, shares, and family businesses—rather than raising wages, which he sees as futile in a technology-driven economy where labor value is eroding. The two agreed on diagnosing the problem—concentration of power in big tech and finance, hollowing out of the middle class, and the pitchforks are coming—but diverged sharply on the path forward. Hanauer insisted robust democracy and government intervention are the only counterweight to corporate power, while Priestley warned of government incompetence and urged personal agency and entrepreneurship. The conversation also surfaced revelations about economic history, including Hanauer's claim that marginal productivity theory was invented in 1879 explicitly to prevent worker revolts, and Bartlett's data showing an Anthropic engineer who no longer writes code because AI agents do it all. Both guests agreed the future is uncertain, inequality is accelerating, and without intervention—whether through breaking up monopolies, taxing corporations at point of consumption, or empowering small business—Western democracies risk collapse.

Key takeaways

More stories More from Diary of a CEO