← All stories
Education & Learning

Children Cognitively Inferior to Parents for First Time in Modern History

Triggernometry · "We’re Regressing Into The Unknown" - Dr Jared Cooney Horvath · June 3, 2026
Children Cognitively Inferior to Parents for First Time in Modern History
Triggernometry
Triggernometry
"We’re Regressing Into The Unknown" - Dr Jared Cooney Horvath
"Since we've been recording cognitive development, turn of the century, late 1800s into the 1900s, every generation outperforms their parents. You name it, on basic IQ, memory, attention, literacy, numeracy. And then 2010 rolls around, and all of a sudden schooling and development decouple. Kids today spend more time in schools than we did growing up, but all of their scores are down, lower than ours. They're now equivalent to us in about 1992."
Jared Horvath testified before the U.S. Senate that cognitive development has reversed for the first time since measurements began in the 1800s. Children now test at 1992 levels despite more schooling, with the decline beginning precisely in 2010 when screens entered classrooms at scale. He attributes the regression entirely to digital technology replacing analog learning.

About this episode

On this episode of Trigonometry, hosts Francis Foster and Konstantin Kisin interviewed neuroscientist Jared Horvath about the catastrophic impact of screen technology on children's cognitive development and learning. Horvath, who spent 18 years researching the science of learning and recently testified before the U.S. Senate, revealed that children today are cognitively inferior to their parents for the first time since measurements began in the 1800s, with development reversing precisely in 2010 when screens entered classrooms at scale. He presented evidence that 50 percent of American students now have special educational plans for learning disorders, most of which he argues are induced ADHD caused by screens rather than genuine biological conditions. The conversation covered the neuroscience of how screens create addiction cycles through dopamine manipulation, why online social interaction triggers depression chemicals rather than bonding hormones, and comprehensive data showing that more classroom screen time linearly correlates with worse academic outcomes. Horvath exposed how school districts mandate technology use despite zero evidence of benefit, citing a Kansas district that threatened to fire teachers who didn't use laptops 20 minutes daily. He argued that the $21 billion spent on educational technology infrastructure represents a financial incentive rather than pedagogical improvement, comparing it to giving children an untested drug. The episode concluded with practical advice for parents, including making homes analog, demanding evidence from schools, and recognizing that teachers privately oppose tech mandates but cannot speak publicly without risking their jobs. Horvath advocated for a complete government moratorium on new educational technology until efficacy can be proven.

Key takeaways

More stories More from Triggernometry