Dave Rubin Report
Episode overview

Watch Host Go Into a Rage When Guest Proves Her Wrong On-Air

Dave Rubin Report · 6m · 1 Egleze moment
Watch Host Go Into a Rage When Guest Proves Her Wrong On-Air
Episode summary

The host discusses a recent Supreme Court decision upholding birthright citizenship, expressing strong disagreement with the ruling despite support from conservative justices. The episode centers on claims that 1.5 million Chinese nationals have obtained US citizenship through birth tourism and birthright citizenship, citing testimony from Peter Schweitzer of the Government Accountability Institute to the Senate. The host criticizes CNN anchor Abby Phillip for defending the current system during a contentious on-air exchange with guest Lydia Moahan. The discussion includes references to historical CNN coverage from 2015 documenting Chinese use of American surrogates to secure citizenship for their children, with agencies reporting 40 percent of their clients coming from China. The host argues the practice is fundamentally absurd, comparing it to hypothetical scenarios of Americans giving birth while on vacation in foreign countries. Additional claims include that 61 percent of people who come to have children utilize social welfare services. The episode frames the issue as exploitation by foreign adversaries while criticizing media figures for what the host characterizes as partisan defense of the policy rather than honest engagement with its consequences.

Key points
Watch original episode More from Dave Rubin Report

1 moments from this episode

Source-linked · editorially selected
01
Politics

1.5 Million Chinese Nationals Gained US Citizenship Through Birth Tourism

Host cites testimony from Government Accountability Institute president Peter Schweitzer claiming 1.5 million Chinese nationals have obtained US citizenship through birthright citizenship, with significant numbers utilizing birth tourism. The discussion follows a Supreme Court decision upholding birthright citizenship despite conservative opposition. The host argues this practice is absurd and exploited by foreign adversaries.

Read this moment →