David Sacks Calls Out Dario’s Contradictions on AI & Data Centers

In this short All-In Podcast segment, co-host David Sacks criticises what he frames as contradictions in AI policy arguments associated with “Dario”, apparently referring to Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei. Sacks recalls that Amodei previously made the case for restricting the export of advanced AI chips on the grounds that the US should host data centres capable of running large numbers of AI “agents” at “Nobel Prize-winning level” scientific ability, giving the US an advantage over China.

Sacks then argues that current policy and advocacy trends amount to “banning” or over-regulating data centres, which he says would prevent the US from building the very compute infrastructure implied by that earlier argument. He further claims that efforts to restrict chip sales extend to US allies, which he says would also limit allied capacity to build such data centres.

Sacks urges Amodei to publicly support a more permissive approach to data-centre build-out if he still believes in the “data centers full of geniuses” thesis. He says he has not seen Amodei take that position and ends by questioning whether Amodei only advances what Sacks calls the “doomer side” of AI debates, rather than politically advocating for more optimistic, growth-oriented scenarios.

• David Sacks recalls “Dario” arguing for AI chip export restrictions in the context of US strategic advantage.
• Sacks says the argument depended on the US building data centres to run large numbers of highly capable AI “agents”.
• He alleges current moves amount to “banning” or over-regulating data centres, undercutting that strategy.
• He also claims chip-sale restrictions are being applied to US allies, limiting their data-centre build-out too.
• Sacks calls on Dario Amodei to publicly oppose over-regulation of data centres if he still holds the earlier view.
• Sacks questions whether Amodei only advances the “doomer side” of AI policy debates.