Area52
Episode overview

Neuroscientist Breaks Silence on Psychic Testing - Dr. Julia Mossbridge | ep. 99

Area52 · 14 August 2026 · 3h 3m · 3 Egleze moments
Neuroscientist Breaks Silence on Psychic Testing - Dr. Julia Mossbridge | ep. 99 ▶

What happened in this episode?

Area52 host Chris meets neuroscientist Dr Julia Mossbridge to discuss parapsychology-adjacent research claims, consciousness theories, and the ethics of attempting to access non-local information. Mossbridge offers a detailed personal account of growing up in a US military-base school system and being placed in a gifted programme she calls “Soore”, alleging that some testing was not educational and involved immediate memory lapses; she describes a recurring walk to a small room, then “remember[ing] nothing” once the door closed. She links later experiences to this background, including claiming her early school transcript “comments” were redacted when she sought records for a federal clearance process, and describing a sequence in which a FOIA request about the programme was followed by unusual rapid contact and a prompt to drop the request.

The conversation then broadens into speculative frameworks: an “informational substrate” underpinning mind and matter, and debates about whether out-of-body experiences are dangerous or better understood as altered, constructed perception. Mossbridge also makes research-related assertions, including experiments in which higher self-reported “unconditional love” correlated with improved performance on precognitive remote-viewing tasks, and claims about using AI models to score remote-viewing correspondences in a lucid-dream experiment. She further outlines an extraordinary physics-related claim about photon “boundary conditions” and says she is building a startup to use early physical signals to predict future outcomes.

The episode mixes first-person allegations, methodological claims, and metaphysical argument, with frequent acknowledgement that many points are uncertain or difficult to test.

What are the key points?

Which topics are covered?

How is this page sourced?

Programme
Area52
Published
14 August 2026
Duration
3h 3m
Original episode
Open the original source ↗

Egleze verifies the speaker, source and timestamp for each linked moment. Unless a moment is explicitly marked independently verified, statements remain attributed claims by the named speaker rather than established facts.

Watch original episode More from Area52

3 moments from this episode

Source-linked · editorially selected
01
Controversial

Julia Mossbridge alleges gifted programme testing involved “deliberate memory removal”

at 16:58 · Attributed speaker claim
“They were doing testing on us that was not about that. Um, and that didn't seem to be for our benefit and some of which had deliberate, as far as I can tell, deliberate memory removal.”

Neuroscientist Dr Julia Mossbridge says she believes her childhood ‘gifted’ education programme (which she calls “Soore”) involved testing beyond standard cognitive assessment and that she experienced repeated memory gaps immediately after sessions. She frames this as an inference from her recollections, documents she says she retained, and comparisons with other accounts from similar programmes, while acknowledging uncertainty about mechanism (drug, hypnosis, etc.).

02
Politics

Mossbridge says childhood school transcripts were “all redacted” during clearance process

at 24:42 · Attributed speaker claim
And the comments area from 1st through 8th grade, they're all redacted. So that's what made me— so I said, sorry, I'm me, so I think I get to see these. And they're like, yeah, no, wait, this is what we have.

Mossbridge recounts applying for a federal job requiring security clearance and being asked to submit her full schooling transcripts. She says the “comments area” on records from first through eighth grade was redacted, and that the institution told her it did not have an unredacted version; she says she compared at least one record with a copy kept by her mother.

03
Consciousness & Medicine

Mossbridge says “unconditional love” scores predicted better precognitive remote viewing performance

at 1:01:30 · Attributed speaker claim
The folks who rated themselves as feeling a higher level of unconditional love, which was part of the experiment for another reason, were also significantly better at precognitive remote viewing. How significant?

Mossbridge says she observed a statistical association between participants’ self-reported “unconditional love” and performance on precognitive remote-viewing tasks, first in a small in-person study (36 participants) and later online (305 participants). She presents the finding as an empirical correlate rather than proof of mechanism, describing it within a broader theory that emotional states may affect access to information.