We Study Billionaires
Episode overview

A Star Investor's Tale of Risk, Ruin & Reinvention w/ Victor Haghani (RWH071)

We Study Billionaires · 9 August 2026 · 1h 56m · 4 Egleze moments
A Star Investor's Tale of Risk, Ruin & Reinvention w/ Victor Haghani (RWH071) ▶

What happened in this episode?

Investor and former LTCM partner Victor Haghani discusses his early life between the US, Iran and the UK, then his formative years on Salomon Brothers’ fixed-income arbitrage desk. He describes emblematic relative-value trades that combined financing advantages, futures basis and options volatility, and recalls the desk’s ‘Liars Poker’ culture as both entertainment and a way to think about probabilities and restraint.

The interview then turns to Long-Term Capital Management. Haghani outlines how LTCM’s returns outpaced expectations as trades converged quickly, and he walks through an Italian bond strategy designed to harvest carry while reducing credit tail risk through layered hedges. He disputes aspects of the popular When Genius Failed narrative, saying the fund operated by committee and consensus and arguing the book was written too soon and without interviews with partners. On the 1998 crisis, he says LTCM’s direct Russia positions were not the main loss driver; rather, Russia acted as a trigger for a system-wide ‘risk-off’ deleveraging in crowded trades. He alleges large banks also held similar exposures, including claims about Goldman Sachs’ scale and possible Citigroup liquidations.

Haghani offers a personal admission that he over-allocated his own family wealth to LTCM, saying he failed to account for exposure via the management company and his human capital. He explains expected utility as a decision framework for position sizing, arguing individuals should prioritise avoiding ruin and generally avoid leverage, while institutional pools can rationally allocate small slices to leveraged strategies.

Later, he describes moving away from alternative investments, citing tax inefficiency and complexity, towards low-cost indexing and rule-based asset allocation principles that influenced his later work.

What are the key points?

Which topics are covered?

How is this page sourced?

Programme
We Study Billionaires
Published
9 August 2026
Duration
1h 56m
Original episode
Open the original source ↗

Egleze verifies the speaker, source and timestamp for each linked moment. Unless a moment is explicitly marked independently verified, statements remain attributed claims by the named speaker rather than established facts.

Watch original episode More from We Study Billionaires

4 moments from this episode

Source-linked · editorially selected
01
Money

Haghani says Russia exposures were small; main LTCM losses came from global ‘risk-off’

at 50:45 · Attributed speaker claim
We didn't have very large positions in Russia. We didn't lose a lot of money on Russia. Um but the Russian default was the was the spark that set off this huge riskoff move around all around the financial system.

Discussing the 1998 Russian default, Haghani says LTCM’s direct positions in Russia were limited and were not the main source of losses. He describes Russia as the trigger for a system-wide pullback in balance sheet and risk appetite that widened spreads across the trades LTCM held elsewhere.

02
Money

Haghani argues systemic risk in 1998 came from crowded trades, not LTCM size

at 54:27 · Attributed speaker claim
The systemic problems of LTCM had to do with the fact that uh turned out that everybody else had on similar positions to LTCM. Goldman had position sizes that were four times bigger than LTCM's positions in certain of the big positions.

Haghani says LTCM’s crisis became systemic because other large firms held similar relative-value positions, leaving the market vulnerable to a broad ‘risk-off’ unwind. He claims Goldman Sachs had exposures several times larger than LTCM in some positions, arguing the episode cannot be explained by hedge fund leverage alone.

03
Money

Haghani suggests Citigroup liquidations may have triggered 1998 spread blowout

at 54:50 · Attributed speaker claim
it's probably the case that liquidation within Cityroup of the arbitrage desks kind of set off the widening of all the spreads that ultimately resulted in the distress and crisis of late 98.

Haghani says one plausible driver of the 1998 market dislocation was deleveraging inside large banks, singling out what he calls liquidation within Citigroup’s arbitrage desks. He frames this as a likely catalyst for spreads widening across markets, which then amplified LTCM’s losses.

04
Money

Victor Haghani says he had 80% of liquid net worth in LTCM

at 1:00:25 · Attributed speaker claim
I had somewhere around 80% of my family's liquid net worth invested in the fund. And, you know, I kind of thought maybe that's okay, you know, to have 20% that wasn't, but I didn't also account for the fact that um that I owned a lot of the management company.

Victor Haghani, a co-founder of Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM), says he had about 80% of his family’s liquid net worth invested in the fund before its 1998 collapse. He adds he failed to account for additional exposure through ownership of the management company and the extent to which his income potential was tied to LTCM’s continued success.