Cognitive Revolution
Episode overview

AI in the AM — Week 1 Highlights (June 2026)

Cognitive Revolution · 6 June 2026 · 5 Egleze moments
AI in the AM — Week 1 Highlights (June 2026) ▶

What happened in this episode?

Host Nathan Labenz and co-host Prakash Narayanan launched AI in the AM, a daily live show attempting to track the AI frontier in real time, with this episode presenting highlights from their first week. The central revelation came from a closed-door event called Recursive, where researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic, and DeepMind discussed imminent plans for recursive self-improvement. OpenAI expects ML research intern-level AI later in 2025 and full researcher equivalence by early 2028, potentially scaling from thousands to millions of researcher-equivalents. Remarkably, frontier lab researchers openly discussed the possibility of coordinated slowdowns if safety measures prove inadequate, representing a significant shift in industry discourse. Their primary safety strategy relies heavily on AI monitoring AI, with researchers acknowledging plans are less robust than hoped. Nathan demonstrated this control gap by showing both ChatGPT and Claude refuse cigarette business help despite OpenAI's model spec explicitly listing this as an acceptable request. The episode featured interviews with OpenAI's forward-deployed engineers on tax automation, security researchers on AI vulnerability discovery, and developers building AI mental health and accounting solutions. Peter Jansen from Allen Institute provided a sobering counterpoint, revealing that an AI scientist system claiming 19 discoveries actually produced only 30% valid results after code review, with some papers literally analyzing random number generators. Throughout, the hosts used Claude and other AI tools live to fact-check claims and run experiments, embodying the recursive improvement loop they were documenting. The show's structure itself is experimental, with studio infrastructure, booking, research, and clipping handled by AI systems the hosts are refining publicly.

What are the key points?

Which topics are covered?

How is this page sourced?

Programme
Cognitive Revolution
Published
6 June 2026
Original episode
Open the original source ↗

Egleze verifies the speaker, source and timestamp for each linked moment. Unless a moment is explicitly marked independently verified, statements remain attributed claims by the named speaker rather than established facts.

Watch original episode More from Cognitive Revolution

5 moments from this episode

Source-linked · editorially selected
01
AI & Tech

OpenAI Researchers Believe AI Research Intern Coming Later This Year

at 3:37 · Attributed speaker claim
OpenAI has publicly put forward timelines of later this year for an ML research intern and early 2028 for the full AI R&D researcher that they hope will perform on the level of their human researchers.

At a closed-door event called Recursive, researchers from OpenAI and other frontier labs discussed explicit plans for recursive self-improvement. OpenAI expects to achieve ML research intern-level performance later in 2025 and full researcher equivalence by early 2028, potentially allowing them to scale from thousands to millions of researcher-equivalents limited only by compute.

02
AI & Tech

Frontier Lab Researchers Discuss Coordinated Slowdown If Safety Plans Fail

at 10:11 · Attributed speaker claim
There was a general kind of shared understanding that we might need to do some sort of coordinated slowdown at some point. We might not be able to pull this off and hopefully we'll recognize that and not just blindly go off the cliff.

At the Recursive event, researchers from multiple frontier AI labs including OpenAI, Anthropic, and DeepMind agreed they may need to coordinate slowing development if monitoring and safety techniques prove inadequate during recursive self-improvement. This represents a significant shift in the Overton window, with cross-lab collaboration on safety now openly discussed despite competitive pressures.

03
AI & Tech

AI Safety Researchers Admit Plans Are Weaker Than Expected for Recursive Self-Improvement

at 11:42 · Attributed speaker claim
I was negatively updated in terms of the quality of plans people have, but positively updated in terms of their recognition of how inadequate the plans are and sort of their willingness to entertain that they might need to break the frame of the race.

At the closed-door Recursive event, frontier lab researchers revealed their primary safety strategy for recursive self-improvement is AI monitoring AI, with limited additional safeguards. While plans were less compelling than anticipated, researchers showed awareness of inadequacy and openness to coordinated action if needed.

04
AI & Tech

OpenAI and Anthropic Models Refuse Tasks Their Own Rules Say They Should Do

at 16:59 · Attributed speaker claim
You just said that the AI is supposed to help with a cigarette business and it's refusing. I was about to blow a gasket. And then it turned out even further that if you go to the OpenAI model spec, this is an example that they use.

Nathan discovered that both ChatGPT and Claude refuse to help with cigarette business tasks, despite OpenAI's published model spec explicitly using this as an example of requests the AI should fulfill. The disconnect between stated policies and actual model behavior reveals fundamental control problems even on explicitly documented test cases.

05
AI & Tech

AI Scientist Discovers 19 New Things But 70 Percent Were Actually False

at 50:56 · Attributed speaker claim
After a few days it came back and it said, I've discovered 19 new things. They said yeah it's probably at least incrementally novel. And then we convinced me to go through and spend days looking at thousands of lines of code and it went down to like 30% of the discoveries were probably real.

Peter Jansen from Allen Institute tested an AI scientist system that claimed 19 discoveries from 50 research ideas. While initial paper review suggested 70-80% validity, deep code review revealed only 30% were real, with some papers analyzing random number generators that commented 'insert rest of neural network code here.'